Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 21:42

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
'Heads of State' Review: John Cena & Idris Elba in Amazon Buddy Comedy - The Hollywood Reporter
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Jordan Ott hiring strengthens questions on Suns’ decision-making tree - Arizona Sports
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How do you emotionally react to when others seem to feel sorry for you?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
What are some good tips for dealing with unmedicated ADHD?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
8 Signs You Should See a Cardiologist, According to Doctors - EatingWell
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Can you write a short story with a twist ending?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Fallout 5 announcement slammed by fans: ‘I don’t understand’ - GAMINGbible
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.